![sorenson squeeze 10 lite sorenson squeeze 10 lite](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uspHt6zl_qM/maxresdefault.jpg)
#Sorenson squeeze 10 lite 1080p
(Sorry, i use google translation, my English is far from perfect.)ġ) Yes, it is a clip from a telecine transfer EUMIG super-8 => 1080p via a NIKON camera lens. The goal of that is to collect practical examples of the problem, circumstances where it shows up, and to help the developers of Resolve to address this issue in a more systematic way. In this particular thread, the main topic is the "GPU out of memory" error shown by Resolve in situations of high load, including situations when Neat Video is used.
#Sorenson squeeze 10 lite how to
Neat Video support staff will reproduce the problem on their machines and will then advise on how to deal with it. Please include a short description of steps required to reproduce the problem using the test project as well as any additional comments that may be needed. If you want to demonstrate any specific filtration problem and get some help or advice about the filter itself from the developers of Neat Video, please prepare a small test project (allowing to reproduce the problem) with a short clip and send the project and clip to support. You may want to ask the developers of Resolve to improve Resolve to make it at least as capable as other OFX hosts such as Nuke, Scratch, etc.ģ. Other OFX hosts work properly in this respect. (Please note that this is a problem of Resolve only. That is why there may be some difference (if you use temporal features like Dust and Scratches) between preview inside Neat Video window and final render results of Resolve. Those functions may work in final render, but not in preview inside Neat Video window. As you can see in the bottom of the Neat Video window, Resolve does not provide those adjacent frames to Neat Video, so some of the functions (including the Dust and Scratches filter) cannot work correctly within that window, simply because there is not enough input data yet.
![sorenson squeeze 10 lite sorenson squeeze 10 lite](https://mac-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Sorenson-Squeeze-Compression-Suite_7.jpg)
Does that original clip have any actual dust and/or scratches (that typically come from scanned film)?Ģ. Loading C: \ Users \ Jean-Claude \ Documents \ Neat Video v4 OpenFX \ Presets \ Advanced \ Dust and scratches \ conservatively Reduce dust and scratches => PREVIEW is OK but the KO result during read and delivery.ġ. Even DEVICE NOISE PROFILE "AUTO" and NOISE FILTER SETTING just custom improvement (temporal 3): render smart user => results OK preview and deliveryĮven DEVICE NOISE PROFILE "AUTO".
![sorenson squeeze 10 lite sorenson squeeze 10 lite](https://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/images2000x2000/sorenson_media_2010l_usb_squeeze_desktop_10_lite_1184168.jpg)
Even DEVICE NOISE PROFILE "AUTO" and NOISE FILTER SETTING preset "Reduce noise and sharpen" + custom improvement (default temporal 2): render smart or user => results OK preview and delivery From a new DEVICE NOISE PROFILE "AUTO" and NOISE FILTER SETTING preset "Reduce noise and sharpen" (default temporal 2): render smart or user => results OK preview and delivery The clip comes from Sorenson Squeeze v10 in DNXHR 10 BITS, cache frame to resolve (general options) => DNXHR HQX I recomme a new project with new clip 1080p 25 fps: Call Neat Video 4.05 Sorry for the delay but I wanted to do and redo all tests.